Skip to main content

Table 6 Messick´s validity framework

From: Improving surgical technical skills for emergency fixation of unstable pelvic ring fractures: an experimental study using a pelvic ring fracture simulator

Aspect of Messick´s Validity

Definition

Evidence from Study

Content validity

The degree to which the content reflects the construct being measured.

Simulation includes all relevant procedures (e.g., SI-screw placement, external fixation).

Substantive validity

The relationship between participants’ responses and the construct.

Increased confidence in performing critical procedures, consistent with the aim of the simulation.

Structural validity

How well the structure of the assessment reflects the construct.

Confidence ratings and procedural outcomes align with expected skill improvements.

Generalizability

The extent to which results apply to other populations and settings.

Participants included residents and consultants; limited by single institution and small sample size.

Consequential validity

The impact of using the assessment on behavior and outcomes.

Increased interest in future practice and improved confidence, but no long-term outcomes (e.g. skills) assessed.